送交者: 草绿 于 July 12, 2009 14:39:00:
回答: 不矛盾。若大于N猜想成立，那就只需证小于N的有限的数了 由 小沙 于 July 12, 2009 13:09:08:
我看过lala的主贴后，与你的看法一致，即陈只证明了大于N的猜想，所以我说他没有完全prove[1+2]. But this N is such a huge number (10**500000). It is hard to imagine that one can provide mathematical proofs, especially when dealing with integers, for numbers not below but above such a huge number.
Then 霍哥 said in his post that his understanding is “陈景润的工作可能是证明了在10**500000以下的偶数中至少有一个不具备这样的性质”。That's why I searched {1+2} conjecture and found that N=12, which is not consistent with 霍哥's understanding. This is the "矛盾" I was referring to.
My impression is that Chen claimed to have solved, not partially, the [1+2} problem. Also, as I said above, that huge N is suspicious. These led me to suspect that the statement in the article about Chen's work may not be accurate.