送交者: morningstar 于 August 08, 2002 20:55:10:
回答: That's perfectly fine. But still, 由 LoyalReader 于 August 08, 2002 19:12:57:
I think your argument is too abstract for me to follow. All scientific conclusions are based on facts and arrived with rational reasonings starting from a few fundmental laws. Otherwise it is called assumption. I reckon that science represents reasoning in the purest form.
As for proving the non-existence of God, I think it is a meanful proposition only if you can provide a clear defination of God AND what would be acceptable evidences of proof to you. Kowing how well science can explain and predict the phenomenon of nature, I think the chance of there exists a God as an independent Being is near zero if it is not zero, if you want to be scientific about it.