送交者: WaterFire 于 November 08, 2002 11:02:28:
回答: 答诸校友:一转眼 来到吉大校友论坛已经半年多了,想走,还真舍不得. 由 一了 于 November 07, 2002 15:06:05:
Here was what was told what was happened more than 2000 years ago:
God decided to have a boy.
God stolen a woman. The woman had a boy friend.
God used the woman to get a boy.
The boy grown up.
God named him (Jesus) his (God’s) propaganda chief, to preach God’s way.
Jesus upset some people in his propaganda work.
These people killed Jesus.
In 24 hours, Jesus was back to live and promoted by God to be in Heaven.
Lets look more carefully at the above story.
First of all, the following should be assumed, or at least told by the believer:
God is all powerful.
Then questions arise:
Why God needed a woman for his baby?
It was told that God made people from dust.
Why he did not made Jesus from dust?
Was because his seeds would not work well with dust? This would shadow a limitation on his power.
Why he did not use tube like scientist doing colon? We cannot say he was less advance. This would cast a limit on his power.
Was because he needed a woman to get his seeds out?
Was God stolen the woman?
Technically, yes. Because the woman was not consulted, her boy friend was not consulted either.
If one used somebody else’s stuff without asking permit ion first, it should be an act of stealing.
Someone will argue that the woman and her boy friend would agree with God anyway.
But, we cannot assume that, because it was said that God gave people free will. That means that they could disagree even towards God, otherwise, the will would not be free.
But politics was involved, people changed the definition of stealing for God’s: only because he was God.
We Chinese also have these kinds of tradition: If you steal from a family, it is stealing. But if you still whole country, it is not stealing.
The underline is: might is right. God certainly set an example to a lot of his followers.
Did God know for doing his propaganda work, Jesus was going to die?
The answer should be yes. Otherwise God would be not all powerful: He did not know the consequence of his and his son’s actions.
Did God know that Jesus’ death was only temporary? Did God know that he was going to save Jesus and made Jesus promoted?
For all the above questions, the answers should be all yes: again, the reason was too simple, all powerful of God guaranteed no other answer was possible.
Did Jesus know doing his father’s propaganda job would result his death?
I would guess the answer should be yes: The loving father knew it. And the loving father would pointed out the dead consequences.
Did Jesus know that his death was only temporary?
The answer should be yes. Because even God his loving father did not tell him that. He should know that his father was all powerful. Otherwise, his propaganda job would be telling lies.
So, what we have here is a big scam in history:
God was the director and actor.
Jesus was an actor.
They made an act: Jesus would temporarily dead. This dead state was less than 24 hours.
They both knew it was an act. They knew the end result was harmless for Jesus.
At the death scene: Jesus asked his father (God) to forgive some people’s act (kill him) which would have no affect on him what so ever, and he knew the result but still delivered the speech in the most sincere way.
What a performance!
What a great show! What a great director (God) and what great actors (the father son team).
But it was only a show! And the show was finished more then 2000 years ago!